Vulnerability assessment for watersheds in Lalitpur and Jhansi districts of Bundelkhand
Student name: Ms Aishwarya Mishra
Guide: Dr Sukanya Das
Year of completion: 2017
Host Organisation: National Institute of Hydrology, Roorkee
Supervisor (Host Organisation): Dr V.C. Goyal
Abstract: Vulnerability is the capacity to anticipate, cope with, resist and recover from the impact of natural
disasters. (Madhuri, 2014). Climatic variability and Disasters have a considerable impact on the lives of
people and in rural areas, the impact is harsher on the lives of people. Hence assessing the degree to
which the lives of the people are affected by climate change disasters is important in order to come up
with solutions to assist those who are victims of natural calamities.
The study seeks to assess the different types of vulnerabilities faced by communities in Patrahi Lakheri
and Sajnam Watershed of Jhansi and Lalitpur districts of Bundelkhand region.
Drought adds to the distraught conditions of the poor and vulnerable people in Bundelkhand, and
subsequently Patrahi Lakheri and Sajnam watershed in Jhansi and Lalitpur districts. Agriculture being
the major source of livelihood in both the regions has a direct negative impact on the people. Therefore,
in order to identify the variability in vulnerability of affected households Livelihood Vulnerability Index -
IPCC framework is used keeping in account of Sustainable Livelihoods Framework for assessing the
adaptive capacity. The study also uses various PRA tools such as FGD’s, Key informant Interview,
Seasonal Calendar, to collect data on qualitative aspects of the study. The data collected by primary and
secondary sources was categorized into 3 major contributing factors- exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive
capacity.
The LVI aims to identify sources and forms of vulnerability that are specific to the context in order to
suggest context-specific adaptive and resilience measures. The study was conducted in the 4 blocks of
Patrahi Lakheri and 5 blocks of Sajnam Watershed. Sajnam Watershed was found to be the less
vulnerable because of better irrigation facilities and better soil and water quality whilst Patrahi Lakheri
was found to be moderately vulnerable because of high climate variability, more sensitivity and less
adaptive strategy. The study also revealed that better access to resources or adaptive measures does not
necessarily mean that households are adopting resilience measures because of indifferent attitudes bat
the grassroots.